Hannah Henry

Hannah Henry

Mentor

Dr. Katie Sieving

College

College of Agricultural and Life Sciences

Major

Wildlife Ecology and Conservation

Minor

Economics

Organizations

CALS Honors Scholars Program, CALS Leadership Institute: Cohort 12, CALS Ambassador Program, Delta Nu Zeta, UF Student Chapter of the Wildlife Society.

Academic Awards

Florida Wildlife Federation Fund, The WEC Jennings Scholarship Fund, Sharon Fitz-Coy Memorial Scholarship, Will Courtney Foundation Scholarship, Central Florida Fair Scholarship, Udall Undergraduate Scholarship UF Endorsed.

Volunteering

The Sea Turtle Conservancy, UF College of Veterinary Medicine Aquatic Animal Health Program, Nature Coast Biological Station, Rooterville Animal Sanctuary.

Research Interests

Behavioral, community, landscape, and evolutionary ecology, with a focus on avian communication and the mechanisms underlying human-bird-environment interactions.

Hobbies and Interests

Birding, gardening, cooking, traveling, swimming, spending time outdoors, cheering on the Gators at football games, and spending time with friends/family.

Research Project

A comparison of Carolina Chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) and Tufted Titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor) intraspecific and interspecific communication variation

Birds within the Paridae family often engage in mixed-species flocks (MSFs), which are congregations of birds from at least 2 different species who rest, forage, and travel together, amongst other activities (Johnson, 2018). These behaviors are accomplished through the critical communication network unique to MSFs that utilizes a variety of calls, signals, and alarms (Jung et al., 2017). Although it is accepted that many animals communicate within their own species, it is not well understood if wild animals communicate directly to species other than their own (Dutour et al., 2020). Past research has shown that animals of different species can interpret and respond appropriately to alarm calls, but the extent of call understanding and whether birds manipulate the way they communicate information depending on the recipient species is unknown (Johnson et al., 2018; Suzuki et al., 2018). This project aims to analyze audience effect (how the composition of audience influences performance of signalers) in the context of avian communication at the intraspecific and interspecific level (Gyger et al., 1986).

  • Dr. Katie Sieving
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Economics
  • Behavioral, community, landscape, and evolutionary ecology, with a focus on avian communication and the mechanisms underlying human-bird-environment interactions.
  • Florida Wildlife Federation Fund, The WEC Jennings Scholarship Fund, Sharon Fitz-Coy Memorial Scholarship, Will Courtney Foundation Scholarship, Central Florida Fair Scholarship, Udall Undergraduate Scholarship UF Endorsed.
  • CALS Honors Scholars Program, CALS Leadership Institute: Cohort 12, CALS Ambassador Program, Delta Nu Zeta, UF Student Chapter of the Wildlife Society.
  • The Sea Turtle Conservancy, UF College of Veterinary Medicine Aquatic Animal Health Program, Nature Coast Biological Station, Rooterville Animal Sanctuary.
  • Birding, gardening, cooking, traveling, swimming, spending time outdoors, cheering on the Gators at football games, and spending time with friends/family.
  • A comparison of Carolina Chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) and Tufted Titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor) intraspecific and interspecific communication variation
  • Birds within the Paridae family often engage in mixed-species flocks (MSFs), which are congregations of birds from at least 2 different species who rest, forage, and travel together, amongst other activities (Johnson, 2018). These behaviors are accomplished through the critical communication network unique to MSFs that utilizes a variety of calls, signals, and alarms (Jung et al., 2017). Although it is accepted that many animals communicate within their own species, it is not well understood if wild animals communicate directly to species other than their own (Dutour et al., 2020). Past research has shown that animals of different species can interpret and respond appropriately to alarm calls, but the extent of call understanding and whether birds manipulate the way they communicate information depending on the recipient species is unknown (Johnson et al., 2018; Suzuki et al., 2018). This project aims to analyze audience effect (how the composition of audience influences performance of signalers) in the context of avian communication at the intraspecific and interspecific level (Gyger et al., 1986).